How Decloedt Applies Bostock Reasoning to California FEHA Claims
When You Can Sue an Employer for Harassment After Decloedt Reshapes California Law Key Takeaways: A recent California Court of Appeal decision, Decloedt v. Radnet, has drawn the reasoning of the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark Bostock v. Clayton County ruling into the framework of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). The alignment reinforces that…
Read MoreCan a Nebraska Auto Insurer Take Extra Time to Investigate a Claim?
Understanding Delays in Your Nebraska Auto Claim Key Takeaways: A Nebraska auto insurer needing additional investigation time must explain why within 15 days of receiving proof of loss and send updates every 30 days. Legitimate reasons include good-faith review and suspected fraud under § 008.03, but where liability is clear the insurer must offer a…
Read MoreHow Nebraska’s LB935 Court Cost Increase Affects Injury Claims in 2026
Rising Court Costs and Your Nebraska Driving Privileges After a Crash Key Takeaways: Nebraska’s LB935 is drawing attention in 2026 for adjusting civil court costs, and that shift matters for anyone weighing whether to file an injury lawsuit. Filing fees and court costs are only one part of the financial picture, and they operate alongside…
Read MoreCan a Green Bay Cyclist Recover Damages From an Underinsured Driver?
Understanding Your Options After a Green Bay Bike Crash Key Takeaways: A Green Bay cyclist can recover damages from an underinsured driver through underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage that bridges the gap when the at-fault driver’s liability limits are insufficient. Wisconsin law allows injured cyclists to pursue the negligent driver’s insurer first, then turn to their…
Read MoreWho Qualifies for Wisconsin’s Age 35 Sexual Abuse Filing Deadline?
Understanding Wisconsin’s Special Filing Window for Abuse Survivors Key Takeaways: Wisconsin’s age-35 civil filing window under Wis. Stat. § 893.587 protects individuals sexually abused as children who wish to sue a perpetrator directly. It reaches institutions only in narrow circumstances, notably claims against clergy and religious organizations under § 895.442. Negligence claims against most other…
Read MoreCan a Redondo Beach Job Applicant Be Rejected Because of a Disability?
Understanding Your Rights When a Job Offer Slips Away Key Takeaways: In most cases, a Redondo Beach job applicant cannot lawfully be rejected simply because of a physical or mental disability. California’s FEHA (Cal. Gov. Code § 12940(a)) prohibits refusing to hire based on disability. The law defines disability broadly, protects applicants during recruitment and…
Read MoreCan an Employer Reject a Remote Work Accommodation After an RTO Mandate?
Understanding Your Right to Remote Work as a Disability Accommodation in California Key Takeaways: An employer cannot automatically reject a remote work accommodation after an RTO mandate, because California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) generally requires covered employers to evaluate each disability-related request individually rather than issuing blanket denials. FEHA applies to private employers…
Read MoreWhat Must Redondo Beach Employers Do During the Interactive Process?
Understanding Your Rights When You Ask for a Disability Accommodation in Redondo Beach Key Takeaways: Under California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act, Redondo Beach employers must engage in a timely, good-faith interactive process when an employee or applicant with a known disability requests accommodation. This duty requires employers to identify and assess potential accommodations, consider…
Read MoreWhy the EFAA Keeps Harassment Cases Out of Arbitration in California
How Harassment Cases Are Handled in California Key Takeaways: A new Ninth Circuit decision, Combs v. Netflix, confirms that the timing of harassment, not just its severity, can decide whether a worker litigates in court or is forced into private arbitration. The Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act (EFAA) generally lets…
Read MoreHow Recording Coworkers Can Jeopardize a Redondo Beach Retaliation Case
Why That Secret Recording Could Backfire in Your Workplace Case Key Takeaways: Recording a coworker without consent can seriously damage a Redondo Beach retaliation case because California is an all-party consent state, making it illegal to record confidential conversations under Penal Code §§ 631, 632, and 632.7. An unlawful recording exposes you to criminal and…
Read More